The Influence of Substrate Width Ratio on the Rectified DC Output Voltage of a Piezoelectric Energy Harvester

Authors

  • Agung Dwi Santoso Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Jakarta Global University, 16412, Indonesia
  • Adhes Gamayel Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Jakarta Global University, 16412, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56904/j-gers.v4i2.161

Keywords:

Piezoelectric Energy Harvester, Wind energy harvesting, Micro windmill, Output voltage, Wind tunnel experiment

Abstract

Piezoelectric energy harvesters (PEHs) have attracted considerable attention as an alternative approach for converting ambient mechanical energy into electrical power, particularly under low-speed wind conditions. In this study, the performance of a micro-windmill-driven piezoelectric wind energy harvesting system is experimentally investigated with emphasis on the effects of wind speed and mechanical configuration ratios. Experiments were conducted in a controlled wind tunnel environment at wind speeds of 6, 7, and 8 m/s to represent low to moderate airflow conditions commonly encountered in practical applications. Three mechanical configuration ratios, namely 1:3, 1:2, and 1:1, were evaluated to assess their influence on the dynamic response and electrical output of the piezoelectric element. The alternating voltage generated by the piezoelectric harvester was rectified, and the output voltage–time characteristics were recorded over a 60 s testing period using a data acquisition system. The experimental results demonstrate that increasing wind speed significantly improves both the voltage rise rate and the achievable steady-state voltage for all tested configurations, indicating enhanced mechanical excitation and energy conversion efficiency at higher airflow velocities. Among the configurations examined, the 1:1 ratio consistently exhibits the highest output voltage and the fastest response, particularly at wind speeds of 7 and 8 m/s, suggesting an optimal mechanical–electrical coupling. The 1:2 configuration shows comparable performance at lower wind speeds, while the 1:3 configuration produces substantially lower voltage output throughout the test duration, reflecting reduced energy transfer effectiveness. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of mechanical configuration and wind speed in determining the performance of piezoelectric wind energy harvesters. The results provide useful design guidelines for optimizing PEH systems intended for self-powered sensors and other low-power electronic applications operating in low-speed wind environments.

References

[1] H. Jarkov, V., Allan, S. J., Bowen, C., & Khanbareh, “Piezoelectric materials and systems for tissue engineering and implantable energy harvesting devices for biomedical applications,” Int. Mater. Rev., vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 683–733, 2021, doi: 10.1080/09506608.2021.1988194.

[2] Z. Zhao, J. Zhu, and W. Chen, “Size-dependent vibrations and waves in piezoelectric nanostructures: a literature review,” Int. J. Smart Nano Mater., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 391–431, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/19475411.2022.2091058.

[3] M. Smith and S. Kar-Narayan, “Piezoelectric polymers: theory, challenges and opportunities,” International Materials Reviews, vol. 67, no. 1. 2022. doi: 10.1080/09506608.2021.1915935.

[4] C. Tuloup, W. Harizi, Z. Aboura, and Y. Meyer, “Integration of piezoelectric transducers (PZT and PVDF) within polymer-matrix composites for structural health monitoring applications: new success and challenges,” Int. J. Smart Nano Mater., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 343–369, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/19475411.2020.1830196.

[5] J. F. A. Madeira and A. L. Araujo, “Optimal distribution of active piezoelectric elements for noise attenuation in sandwich panels,” Int. J. Smart Nano Mater., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 400–416, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/19475411.2020.1829159.

[6] P. Kurt, B. Narayan, J. I. Roscow, and S. Orhan, “Improving piezoelectric energy harvesting performance through mechanical stiffness matching,” Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 31, no. 28, pp. 10721–10734, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2295383.

[7] H.-Y. Shin, H.-Y. Lee, I.-G. Hong, J.-H. Kim, and J. Im, “Piezoelectric property optimization for piezoelectric single crystals using parametric estimation,” J. Asian Ceram. Soc., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 116–129, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1080/21870764.2022.2161153.

[8] P. Hajheidari, I. Stiharu, and R. Bhat, “Performance enhancement of cantilever piezoelectric energy harvesters by sizing analysis,” Int. J. Smart Nano Mater., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 93–116, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/19475411.2020.1751743.

[9] D. Cao, W. Qin, Z. Zhou, and W. Du, “Enhancing wind energy harvesting through two V-shaped attachments and monostable characteristics in the galloping piezoelectric harvester,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 318, p. 118871, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118871.

[10] C. Xiong et al., “Wave-inspired piezoelectric bistable energy harvester considering stress distribution: Design, simulation and experimental investigation,” Eng. Struct., vol. 316, no. July, p. 118535, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118535.

[11] M. Feri, M. Krommer, and A. Alibeigloo, “Three-dimensional static analysis of a viscoelastic rectangular functionally graded material plate embedded between piezoelectric sensor and actuator layers,” Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach., vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 3843–3867, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/15397734.2021.1943673.

[12] X. Chen et al., “A novel valve-less piezoelectric micropump generating recirculating flow,” Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1473–1490, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/19942060.2021.1975573.

[13] Z. Xie and X. Xu, “Experimental study on electro-mechanical response characteristics of PZT5H piezoelectric ceramics under impact loading,” J. Asian Ceram. Soc., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 181–187, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/21870764.2020.1860436.

[14] A. Singh, S. Monga, N. Sharma, K. Sreenivas, and R. S. Katiyar, “Ferroelectric, Piezoelectric Mechanism and Applications,” J. Asian Ceram. Soc., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 275–291, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1080/21870764.2022.2075618.

[15] A. Supriadi, A. Gamayel, and Y. Z. Arief, “The Influence of Piezoelectric and Fin Material on Piezoelectric-mini wind turbine energy harvester,” J. Glob. Eng. Res. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.56904/j-gers.v3i1.78.

[16] A. Gamayel and A. Sunardi, “Performance of piezoelectric energy harvester with various ratio substrate and micro windmill,” Telkomnika (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 480–487, 2024, doi: 10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v22i2.25691.

[17] A. Gamayel, M. Zaenudin, and B. W. Dionova, “Performance of piezoelectric energy harvester with vortex-induced vibration and various bluff bodies,” Telkomnika (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control., vol. 21, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v21i4.24330.

[18] A. Gamayel, “Recent Developments of Piezoelectric Energy Harvester for Scavenging Vibration Energy,” J. Glob. Eng. Res. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 50–55, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.56904/j-gers.v3i2.110.

[19] M. Khazaee, A. Rezania, and L. Rosendahl, “Piezoelectric resonator design and analysis from stochastic car vibration using an experimentally validated finite element with viscous-structural damping model,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, vol. 52, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102228.

[20] Z. Wang, K. Maruyama, and F. Narita, “A novel manufacturing method and structural design of functionally graded piezoelectric composites for energy-harvesting,” Mater. Des., vol. 214, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110371.

[21] M. N. Hasan, M. A. Muktadir, and M. Alam, “Comparative Study of Tapered Shape Bimorph Piezoelectric Energy Harvester via Finite Element Analysis,” Forces Mech., vol. 9, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.finmec.2022.100131.

[22] Y. Yang, Z. Chen, Q. Kuai, J. Liang, J. Liu, and X. Zeng, “Circuit Techniques for High Efficiency Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting,” Micromachines, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1044, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/mi13071044.

[23] J. Wang, M. R. A. Nabawy, A. Cioncolini, A. Revell, and S. Weigert, “Planform Geometry and Excitation Effects of PVDF-Based Vibration Energy Harvesters,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 211, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14010211.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-23

How to Cite

Santoso, A. D., & Gamayel, A. (2025). The Influence of Substrate Width Ratio on the Rectified DC Output Voltage of a Piezoelectric Energy Harvester. Journal of Global Engineering Research and Science, 4(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.56904/j-gers.v4i2.161
Views
  • Abstract 0
  • PDF (English) 0